| Changes in the world at the end of the 20th century
make this a time of profound choice for the United States. The foreign policy goals of
creating a more secure, prosperous, and democratic world for the benefit of the American
people remain fundamental. However, deep and lasting changes to the global landscape, such
as new technologies, increasing population, and economic and geopolitical transformations,
have strategic implications for the U.S. international leadership. Defined by reference to the past, the post-cold war era has as its most
significant attribute the absence of any immediate, vital threat to national security. The
demise of the Soviet Union has left the United States as the preeminent world power and
invested it with unparalleled leadership responsibilities. But the end of superpower
competition also eliminated the unifying strategy for U.S. foreign policy. Now, in
addition to regional security issues, an array of threatsweapons proliferation, terrorism,
ethnic and religious conflict, organized crime, drug trafficking, and environmental
degradation challenges U.S. interests and blurs the traditional dividing lines between
domestic and foreign affairs.
Successful U.S. foreign policy depends on recognition of the
conditions that are likely to prevail in this new and evolving international context. Six
strategic assumptions about long-term global trends are an essential starting point for
determining where, when, and how the United States is to engage in the world:
1. Multiple conflicts, crises, and threats--many of them
transnational--rather than a single overriding challenge, will continue to emerge and may
increase in frequency. While these may be small or localized in nature, they will
frequently have potential for wider impact. These challenges will require determination,
resources, and time to resolve.
2. New technologies, the information revolution, and economic
growth have increased the rate of global change, accelerated communications, and
diminished the importance of time and distance. As a result, the world is more
interdependent, while the consequences of political, social, economic, and military
developments are more interrelated.
3. Global problems, especially those related to the
environment, population, and disease, will have ever greater impact. These problems demand
international attention, and solutions must take implications for future generations and
the integrity of the planet into account.
4. Multilateral cooperation and communication will prove
increasingly feasible and effective to prevent crises, resolve problems, build trust, and
advance common interests. Relations between nation-states will nevertheless remain central
to the conduct of international affairs, but nongovernmental actors will gain increasing
influence.
5. Democracy will continue to advance internationally, but
democratic practices will vary among states and will be subject to countervailing
influences and interests.
6. Economic interdependence will increase. Private enterprise
will be the primary driver, although the role of government in maintaining stable
macroeconomic conditions and promoting opportunities will remain critical. New centers of
economic growth and power will emerge, trade and financial flows will accelerate, but
distribution of the economic benefits, both internally and internationally, will be
uneven.
A clear understanding and articulation of foreign policy goals must
be based on recognizing how these six trends affect U.S. conduct of its international
relations. Security, political, economic, and global priorities are not uniformly fixed,
but vary with time and circumstance, are interlinked, and often involve difficult
tradeoffs.
Diplomacy is America's first line of defense. Sustained military
strength and flexibility are necessary to assure national security, but the conduct of
U.S. relations with the rest of the world through an effective international presence and
discerning leadership is what makes the United States a force for peace. Relatively small
investments in diplomacy and sustainable development now to prevent conflict, create the
conditions for economic growth, promote democracy, enhance communication, and protect the
environment decrease the possibilities of much more costly conflict later and help ensure
the prosperity and well-being of the American people.
Foreign affairs today has many dimensions in addition to national
security, trade, and other traditional concerns. The number of nation-states,
international organizations, and other involved parties each with their own interests and
objectives has multiplied. Direct interaction and communication with foreign and domestic
nongovernmental organizations and publics is an increasingly essential responsibility.
Equally important, the intersection of domestic and foreign issues has expanded to affect
every American and involve virtually the entire U.S. Government. In pursuing its
international objectives, the United States must take into account the multiple and often
competing intentions and interests of other governments and organizations, public opinion,
Congress, and other U.S. agencies, as well as resource constraints.
Protecting national interests and advancing U.S. goals involves
virtually every agency of the U.S. Government and requires a set of strategic assets:
 | Expert diplomacy, a strong military, and effective intelligence,
working in coordination to maintain national security; |
 | Fundamental capabilities to carry out international affairs missions
in public diplomacy, sustainable development, and arms control; |
 | Full participation by domestic and specialized U.S. agencies in those
aspects of international affairs that pertain to their particular scopes of authority and
expertise; |
 | Programs in sustainable development, military cooperation,
peacekeeping, law enforcement, finance, international information, academic and cultural
exchange, and other fields to provide the means necessary to address problems and achieve
objectives; and |
 | Diplomatic readiness consisting of the human resources,
infrastructure and operations, and information resources management necessary for a strong
U.S. international presence. |
In order for the United States to fulfill its foreign policy goals
with lasting effect, these assets must have the capability for worldwide deployment, be
well coordinated, be stable enough to pursue long-term objectives, be flexible enough to
prevent and mitigate emerging crises, have sufficient resources to meet established
objectives, and have the support of the American people.
Source: U.S. Department of State Strategic Plan http://www.state.gov/www/global/general_foreign_policy/overview.html
FY 1998 International
Affairs Budget |
(Accounts by
Appropriations Subcommittee) |
| (Budget Authority - $ Millions) |
FY 1996
Actual |
FY 1997
Estimate |
FY 1998
Request |
| TOTAL FUNCTION 150 (DISCRETIONARY) |
18,491 |
18,227 |
19,451 |
| FOREIGN OPERATIONS |
12,442 |
12,250 |
13,324 |
| Export-Import Bank |
763 |
715 |
630 |
| Overseas Private Investment Corporation |
(93) |
(131) |
(158) |
| Trade and Development Agency |
40 |
40 |
43 |
| Agency for International Development: |
2,335 |
2,352 |
2,401 |
| Development Assistance |
1,617 |
1,133 |
998 |
| Development Fund for Africa |
0 |
0 |
700 |
| Child Survival |
0 |
500 |
0 |
| International Disaster Assistance |
181 |
190 |
190 |
| USAID Operating Expenses (incl. IG) |
524 |
518 |
502 |
| USAID Credit Programs |
13 |
12 |
11 |
| Economic Support Fund (incl. Fund for
Ireland) |
2,350 |
2,363 |
2,498 |
| Assistance for Eastern Europe and the
Baltic States |
510 |
475 |
492 |
| Assistance for the New Independent States
of the former Soviet Union |
623 |
613 |
900 |
| Partnership for Freedom.. |
|
|
[528] |
| Technical Assistance.. |
|
|
[372] |
| Debt Restructuring (Including Jordan debt
forgiveness) |
10 |
27 |
34 |
| Peace Corps |
218 |
220 |
222 |
| Inter-American Foundation, African
Development Foundation |
31 |
32 |
36 |
| International Narcotics and Crime |
120 |
213 |
230 |
| Refugee Assistance |
721 |
700 |
700 |
| Anti-Terrorism Assistance |
16 |
18 |
19 |
| Israel Emergency Counterterrorism |
50 |
50 |
0 |
| Non-Proliferation and Disarmament Fund |
20 |
15 |
15 |
| International Military Education and
Training |
39 |
43 |
50 |
| Foreign Military Financing (incl. loan
subsidies) |
3,352 |
3,291 |
3,340 |
| Peacekeeping Operations (Voluntary) |
71 |
65 |
90 |
| Special Defense Acquisition Fund |
(173) |
(166) |
(106) |
| Multilateral Development Banks (incl.
ESAF) |
1,153 |
986 |
1,523 |
| International Organizations and Programs
(Voluntary) |
285 |
331 |
365 |
| COMMERCE, JUSTICE, STATE |
4,903 |
4,949 |
5,239 |
| State Department Operations |
2,418 |
2,492 |
2,548 |
| Machine-Readable Visa Fees |
[115] |
[137] |
140 |
| Other Administration of Foreign Affairs |
65 |
72 |
67 |
| Contributions to International
Organizations (Assessed) |
892 |
882 |
1,023 |
| Contributions for International
Peacekeeping Activites (Assessed) |
359 |
352 |
286 |
| US Information Agency |
1,083 |
1,059 |
1,078 |
| Arms Control and Disarmament Agency |
39 |
42 |
46 |
| Other Programs |
47 |
50 |
51 |
| AGRICULTURE |
1,134 |
1,018 |
887 |
| PL-480 Title I |
263 |
151 |
10 |
| PL-480 Title II |
821 |
837 |
837 |
| PL-480 Title III |
50 |
30 |
30 |
| LABOR/OTHER |
11 |
11 |
11 |
| United States Institute of Peace |
11 |
11 |
11 |
Source: http://www.state.gov/www/global/general_foreign_policy/fy98_ia_bud.html |